Curse

SavageX378 · Jul 10, 2007, 11:58 PM // 23:58

Well, I had a feeling someone was gonna mention about people leaving with a legit reason that would be negatively affected by this. If that's the case, I suggest this then:

- The number of points added when leaving increases depending on how many times the player leaves within a certain time frame. The first time a player leaves s/he will get no points added but if s/he leaves a number of times within say an hour of playing, the points will increase per leave.

Here is a table for example:

first leave = 0 points
second leave = 1 (0+1) points
third leave = 3 (1+2) points
fourth leave = 6 (3+3) points
etc...

Once the player had stopped leaving games and about say 6 hours passes, the increments will reset to zero, allowing the player to leave a game with no points added.

- The amount of points subtracted from the title when player stays in a game follows the same pattern in reverse. The first game he will lose 5 points, the next he will lose 6, then 8, then 11, etc.

- Also, I should had noted earlier, this title is account wide rather than character based and the title can't be displayed to prevent people from showing it off.

Of course, I'm ok with the idea of just scrapping this whole idea and just use the same idea that World of Warcraft uses for their "deserter debuff" which prevents players from re-entering a pvp battleground for 15 minutes. I'm not too big on copying an idea from another game though, hence my suggestion of a title instead.

bathazard · Jul 11, 2007, 12:05 AM // 00:05

/signed
i think that if they get a point in this title more than once it must be shown so people don't add them to there group.

Mister O · Jul 11, 2007, 12:05 AM // 00:05

In addition, this title does not count towards KOADB title, and cannot be displayed by players.

Echuu Ishtar · Jul 11, 2007, 12:54 AM // 00:54

It's a neat idea, but it's very iffy. I don't know... /halfsigned I guess.

KlutzySpy · Jul 11, 2007, 01:25 AM // 01:25

/signed

healing is accually seen by the program as backwardsdamage, and is just as calcueable as damage

OI-812 · Jul 11, 2007, 01:28 AM // 01:28

/signed

Watch a bunch of asshats leave repeatedly just to get the title though. Like some kind of perverse badge of honor.

Nemo the Capitalist · Jul 11, 2007, 01:55 AM // 01:55

id be one of the people tring to get ______MASTER_LEECHER R10
10,000,000 faction leeched
bonus: lag is incresed 30%

^_^ like suggestion?

JeniM · Jul 11, 2007, 02:03 AM // 02:03

OK what i never understood is all the people that say "thats life"

Its not life it's a game, and therefore why do we have to suffer the same crap ingame as we do everyday in life?

haggus71 · Jul 13, 2007, 03:37 AM // 03:37

Yes, it's a game. JUST a game. As far as hitting leavers...what about this case? You start Ft Aspenwood. 5 guys from a guild/alliance decide they don't want to do it(gotta go bugger or whatever), and the three of you are left. So are you saying those three have to sit through the whole battle or suffer a penalty? If so, you need to also reward those who stick it through to the end. Otherwise you are penalizing the whole group for a few.

Anyways, it doesn't happen to me enough to matter. Maybe if I played it for 6 hours in a row it might, but usually it might happen once.

Hyper.nl · Jul 13, 2007, 08:17 AM // 08:17

/notsigned

Now we might get "Loyality title" leacher bots.

Stupid Shizno · Jul 13, 2007, 08:24 AM // 08:24

been requested before

this is just insane, people leave for good reasons and bad reasons, but theres always a reason. real life, bed time, work, whatever. those who leave because of rage is not a huge precentage. maybe in pugs its a lot but who pugs these days anyways. if this does get added into game, your just giving a reason those who do rage to rage more, and those who rage and dont want the title to just turn off thier modem then turn it back on.

freekedoutfish · Jul 13, 2007, 08:34 AM // 08:34

A few problems...

1) You dont always know if a person is leaving with no good reason. They might get cut off, or have something important come up.

2) This would be a title I assume with a max limit? None PvP players would exploit it to get a max title.

Faer · Jul 13, 2007, 09:27 AM // 09:27

I regret to inform you that this has been suggested before in this forum, and therefore this thread is being locked as per the forum guidelines, found here. Please be careful to thoroughly review the forums before creating a new suggestion thread.